> How about 2 entries. One for devices 0x1000 to 0x9009 and one for
> 0x9010 to 0x9999 ? Care to make up a patch for this?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Certainly. I assumed you meant 0x900a-0x9999 for the newer cameras.
--
Dan Scholnik
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.2-rc1/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h.orig 2004-01-22
01:45:43.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.2-rc1/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_devs.h 2004-02-02 02:33:43.140178568
-0500
@@ -602,12 +602,20 @@
* - They don't like the INQUIRY command. So we must handle this command
* of the SCSI layer ourselves.
*/
-UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x07cf, 0x1001, 0x1000, 0x9999,
+UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x07cf, 0x1001, 0x1000, 0x9009,
+ "Casio",
+ "QV DigitalCamera",
+ US_SC_8070, US_PR_CB, NULL,
+ US_FL_FIX_INQUIRY ),
+
+/* Later Casio cameras apparently tell the truth */
+UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x07cf, 0x1001, 0x900a, 0x9999,
"Casio",
"QV DigitalCamera",
US_SC_DEVICE, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL,
US_FL_FIX_INQUIRY ),
+
/* Submitted by Hartmut Wahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*/
UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x0839, 0x000a, 0x0001, 0x0001,
"Samsung",
-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
