On Sat, 7 Feb 2004, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > On Fri, 6 Feb 2004, Alan Stern wrote: > > > Can someone who has a VIA-based UHCI controller please try out this patch > > and let us know if anything goes wrong? > > Noticed nothing wrong. Should I have noticed any difference? lspci -v > reports exactly the same information. Or where is the over-current > protection supposed to be reported? Tested on a USB-2 EHCI (with VIA UHCI) > card.
Thanks for testing. No, you should not have noticed any difference, not unless you configured USB debugging on and checked the details of the root hub characteristics in the debugging log. The _true_ test would be to see if it works when an overcurrent state exists. Unfortunately it's not so easy to generate an overcurrent state -- you'd have to do something like cut open a USB cable and short together all four conductors, and that probably wouldn't be too good for your host controller. Mainly I just wanted to know that the driver would continue to work normally, that the status bits which on Intel chips indicate overcurrent don't appear to mean something else on another vendor's chips. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
