Can anyone answer the question in the Subject: line? Is it just an historical relic?
I'm not aware of any completion handlers using the pt_regs argument. And handlers need not always be called from within an interrupt handler in any case; they can be invoked during a timer callback for instance. Given that the pt_regs doesn't contain any useful information, isn't guaranteed to be non-NULL, and isn't used anyway, why does it persist? Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your Linux Apps Now. Build and deploy apps & Web services for Linux with a free DVD software kit from IBM. Click Now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1356&alloc_id=3438&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
