I didn't try 16, but 32 and 64 were both 'fast', with 128 or 240 slow, yep.
On Sun, 2004-03-21 at 17:28 -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 12:16:15PM +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-03-17 at 19:53 -0800, Matthew Dharm wrote: > > > > > Try changing max_sectors in linux/drivers/usb/storage/scsiglue.c to a > > > smaller number (i.e. 16 or 32 or 64) and see if that improves the transfer speed. > > > > Cool, 32 or 64, about 5x faster than when i went to 128. > > Just to be clear: 240 (the default) and 128 were slow, while 16-64 were > fast? > > Matt > > -- > Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver > > I'm seen in many forms. Now open your mouth. It's caffeine time. > -- Cola Man to Greg > User Friendly, 10/28/1998 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
