On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 16:40, James Bottomley wrote: > On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 16:52, Matt Gulick wrote: > > Where you will get into trouble is that SCSI is not considered to be > a > > 'Dynamic' bus. Devices do not normally come and go, while USB and > 1394 > > devices are 'Hot Plugable'. > > It isn't? considering all the refcounting work that's gone into the > SCSI > stack to make it support hotplug transports, I don't think such a > blanket statement is supportable. > > James
James, You may be right. I have not fully dissected the Linux SCSI stack. I am very intimately familiar with the Darwin SCSI stack as well as the Windose stacks (I had to fully architect USB 2.0 stack with support for SBP-2 under SE, ME and 2k, [I feel so dirty]). The Linux stack may be more forward looking. Matt ---------------------------------------- Matt Gulick Sr. Staff Engineer Adaptec, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] (715) 426-0884 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
