On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 17:09:57 -0700 > Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Was there a reason to add more do-nothing code to host_reset? > > Woopsie. I wanted to write it, but understood that if I return right > code from "bus" reset, it should never be called. Sorry about that... > I'll remove that part.
I haven't had time to look at your patch in any detail yet. But I did notice the extra stuff in the host-reset path. It looks like you're worrying about nothing -- the easiest thing to do would be to remove the host-reset pointer from the host template. Then the SCSI error handler would know that host resets aren't implemented and would never try to carry them out. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel