On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Pete Zaitcev wrote:

> On Sat, 10 Apr 2004 17:09:57 -0700
> Matthew Dharm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > Was there a reason to add more do-nothing code to host_reset?
> 
> Woopsie. I wanted to write it, but understood that if I return right
> code from "bus" reset, it should never be called. Sorry about that...
> I'll remove that part.

I haven't had time to look at your patch in any detail yet.  But I did 
notice the extra stuff in the host-reset path.  It looks like you're 
worrying about nothing -- the easiest thing to do would be to remove the 
host-reset pointer from the host template.  Then the SCSI error handler 
would know that host resets aren't implemented and would never try to 
carry them out.

Alan Stern



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to