On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 12:50:06PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > Marc Singer wrote: > >Russell King prefers that you, David, upload this patch. Is it all > >good with you? > > Looks basically good at a first scan, but your timing is maybe > a bit off since I'm submitting a bunch of PM-related patches and > everything collides! (Since you're changing readl everwhere.) (*) > > If you could re-gen your patch against what's in the gadget-2.6 > tree right now, that'd work a lot better. Then likely I'd just > be able to merge it as-is, after those PM patches, without needing > to worry about whether I broke a working patch you submitted.
Sounds fine to me. There isn't really any hurry. Can you give me a little more to do on? What does gadget-2.6 refer to? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat Software Learn developer strategies Cisco, Motorola, Ericsson & Lucent use to deliver higher performing products faster, at low TCO. http://www.sleepycat.com/telcomwpreg.php?From=osdnemail3 _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
