On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 02:02:53PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > Nobody has paid any attention to this for a while, so here's my > implementation of usb_kill_urb(). The patch to follow (as278) shows how > using it can simplify the hub driver. > > If anyone objects to the two new fields added to struct urb, I've got two > variations on this patch.
I don't object to that, I object to a new function call. If we add this, then what's the use of usb_unlink_urb() at all? Why would a driver ever want to call it? So, why not just fix usb_unlink_urb() to do the same thing that this usb_kill_urb() call does? That seems much simpler to do, and no drivers will have to be changed. thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
