On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 09:14:15AM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > That's going to be painful in 2.4 kernels; usbcore itself doesn't > guarantee enough, plus there are similar issues in SCSI and other > areas. On the other hand, 2.6 is a lot better already, and folk > are trying to chase down the infamous "last few problems" ...
We tried 2.6.5. The first problem we hit was dead mount processes. I'm not really sure how to diagnose that; nothing is actually crashing ... -- Glenn Maynard ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
