Matthew Dharm wrote: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 06:32:14PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: >> On Fri, 30 Apr 2004 16:34:48 -0500 >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Here's the patch (for 2.4) if you're curious. >> >> Do you want me to include all relevant transport types, or you want >> to do it yourself? > > Or the lock could be moved to where the transport is invoked, instead > of putting it in every transport. > > Matt
I guess that would be easier, assuming the only path to the transport (usb_stor_Bulk_transport(), etc.) is through usb_stor_invoke_transport(), which appears to be the case. I'll try it. Thanks Stuart ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id149&alloc_id66&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
