On Sun, May 16, 2004 at 11:48:40AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > Greg & everyone: > > While implementing the suggestion to replace synchronous usb_unlink_urb() > with usb_kill_urb(), a question arose concerning the value stored in > urb->status. Right now the status is -ECONNRESET for asynch and -ENOENT > for synch unlinks. Should I preserve this behavior? Or is now a good > time to do away with -ENOENT, on the grounds that a driver shouldn't care > how an URB was unlinked?
Sounds good to me. > Making this change would require updates to > about a dozen drivers, in most cases simply because they check for -ENOENT > but not -ECONNRESET. (In fact, making them check for both codes wouldn't > hurt, even if we keep both codes.) Or I could even go through _all_ the > drivers and take out the checks for -ENOENT entirely. Maybe this > shouldn't be changed until we start 2.7. Such a minor thing we can fix up now. thanks, greg k-h ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest 6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
