On Sat, Jun 05, 2004 at 09:55:01AM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > On Friday 04 June 2004 23:30, Zephaniah E. Hull wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 04, 2004 at 10:40:43PM +0200, Duncan Sands wrote: > > > > c4bae310 Call Trace: > > > > [<c0336735>] __down+0x85/0x120 > > > > [<c033692f>] __down_failed+0xb/0x14 > > > > [<c026af27>] .text.lock.hub+0x69/0x82 > > > > [<c0272b7f>] usbdev_ioctl+0x19f/0x710 > > > > [<c015a45d>] file_ioctl+0x5d/0x170 > > > > [<c015a686>] sys_ioctl+0x116/0x250 > > > > [<c0103f8f>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb > > > > > > Does this help? > > > > I'm afraid not. > > Are you sure? That seems impossible to me! Can you > get a new call trace please.
Hrm, I could have sworn that the kernel I tested with was rebuilt with
the patch, but now that I am trying it on rc2-mm1 with the patch, it
does in fact seem to be working, mostly.
Thanks a lot, and sorry for the previous report.
I seem to be seeing a locking related race condition on bulk reads and
writes as well, should I start a new thread for those?
--
1024D/E65A7801 Zephaniah E. Hull <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
92ED 94E4 B1E6 3624 226D 5727 4453 008B E65A 7801
CCs of replies from mailing lists are requested.
* james would be more impressed if netgod's magic powers could stop the
splits in the first place...
* netgod notes debian developers are notoriously hard to impress
-- Seen on #Debian
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
