On Tuesday 15 June 2004 18:01, David Brownell wrote:
> Duncan Sands wrote:
> >>Are there plans to replace usbfs with sysfs, or increase sysfs's 
> >>functionality (e.g. I/O with device endpoints)?
> > 
> > 
> > I have a plan to rewrite usbfs along the lines of gadgetfs.
> 
> How much of a plan?  :)

More of a desire than a plan :)  I wanted to first clean up the existing
usbfs a bit, in order to understand it better, then design usbfs2.  I'm
at the beginning of the cleaning phase.

> I have some notes about what I think "usbfs2" should
> probably do.  With more questions than answers, to be
> honest!  Because "more like gadgetfs" only gets part
> way into the problem.  Would it help if I posted that?

Please do.

Ciao,

Duncan.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference
Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer
Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA
REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to