On Tuesday 15 June 2004 18:01, David Brownell wrote: > Duncan Sands wrote: > >>Are there plans to replace usbfs with sysfs, or increase sysfs's > >>functionality (e.g. I/O with device endpoints)? > > > > > > I have a plan to rewrite usbfs along the lines of gadgetfs. > > How much of a plan? :)
More of a desire than a plan :) I wanted to first clean up the existing usbfs a bit, in order to understand it better, then design usbfs2. I'm at the beginning of the cleaning phase. > I have some notes about what I think "usbfs2" should > probably do. With more questions than answers, to be > honest! Because "more like gadgetfs" only gets part > way into the problem. Would it help if I posted that? Please do. Ciao, Duncan. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by The 2004 JavaOne(SM) Conference Learn from the experts at JavaOne(SM), Sun's Worldwide Java Developer Conference, June 28 - July 1 at the Moscone Center in San Francisco, CA REGISTER AND SAVE! http://java.sun.com/javaone/sf Priority Code NWMGYKND _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel