On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 16:39:57 +0200 Oliver Neukum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. Users want another private pointer in struct urb. > As for a second pointer, although I agreed at first, I've now changed > my mind. It seems to me that the common pattern of use of the context > pointer of struct urb is stupid. In almost all cases we point it at a device > descriptor. This is quite odd, as the URB as addressed at a specific device. >[...] > We should use that information and let urb->context > point at the associated scsi request or skb. I agree, one extra pointer is quite sufficient. -- Pete ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
