[Corrected a messed-up email address in Matt's message] On Mon, 28 Jun 2004, Matthew Dharm wrote:
> The first thing to do is check the revision numbers reported by the two > devices in question. > > Joel, does your system generate the 'unneeded entry' message? > > Matt > > On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 05:02:41PM +0200, Jo?l Bourquard wrote: > > Hi Alan, > > > > That's a good question :-) > > > > There seem to be two different flavors of ISD-300 (ie: 05ab,0060) > > devices, one of which needs this entry to work, and the other doesn't. > > > > I have a 2 1/2'' HDD enclosure which (just like your device) doesn't > > need the entry (so when I plug it, I get the same warning as you). > > > > However, I also happen to own two 5 1/4'' CD-ROM enclosures, for which > > this entry *is* necessary. I tried again, very recently to remove my > > unusual_devs.h entry, and it prevented them from working. > > > > So, I think the entry should be kept (it does more good than harm), but > > maybe it could get some tweaking ? If there's a way to recognize these > > "CD-ROM enclosure" bridge chips and exclude the others, I'm all for it. > > > > If you need some more info about those "CD-ROM enclosure" devices, I'd > > be glad to provide it -- but I'm no USB expert :-) > > > > btw my name is Joël (but the accented 'e' letter didn't go through) Sorry about the mistake. > > > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Joël The best thing would be to see the /proc/bus/usb/devices entry for each of the enclosures. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
