So having usbfs mounted with one set of options and usbdevfs with another isn't possible. Is it time to just get rid of usbdevfs? If not, should the mount options apply to both filesystems the same or should the options be seperated into usbfs and usbdevfs options? I wanted to discuss a bit before submitting the patch.
Since "usbfs" was just supposed to eliminate the name-confusion (it's unrelated to "devfs"), the options should be the same.
I'm not sure it'd be good to remove the "usbdevfs" name until the 2.7 development starts though; that'd almost certainly break one or more distributions, even though they've had lots of time to start convertings.
- Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
