On Thu, 8 Jul 2004, Rogério Brito wrote: > Well, the patch doesn't apply here cleanly with kernel 2.6.7. Here is what > I have around the line where the patch you just sent me should be applied: > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > default: /* presumably an error */ > /* Cause a hub reset after 10 consecutive errors */ > dev_dbg (&hub->intf->dev, "transfer --> %d\n", urb->status); > if ((++hub->nerrors < 10) || hub->error) > goto resubmit; > hub->error = urb->status; > /* FALL THROUGH */ > > /* let khubd handle things */ > case 0: /* we got data: port status changed */ > break; > } > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > That's the final part of a switch statement. I don't have the for that you > had in your patch. Do you want me to upgrade my kernel tree to yours so > that we can stay in sync?
No, it doesn't matter. I can't keep track of all the different versions floating around anyway. > I will try anyway to put that if right after the "case 0:" clause. Yes, please do. The output from the printk inside the "if" statement is all that matters. > > Go ahead and post the debugging messages here. Be sure to turn on the > > usb-storage debugging option in the kernel configuration. > > Ok. Should I do that after the issue above is resolved? It's a separate question so it can be discussed independently. Before, after, or during are all okay. Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
