Alan Stern wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, David Brownell wrote:

When I get a moment to re-test the CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND patch,
along with its locktree() primitive, I'll repost that patch
against Linus' BK tree.  Deltas from the 2.6.7 patch there
are for the usb_new_device() reorganization, and some smarter
handling of drivers without suspend/resume support.


Will you adopt the naming scheme for local variables in hub.c that I started (nudge, nudge)?

I switched that over several weeks ago ... :)


Then I'll have to see if those locking changes in Greg's
tree break anything.  I've not really made time to look at
those yet; it needs some real thought.  This seems like a
case where cross-pollination is inevitable ... :)


I didn't mention it before, but your locktree() routine is another place that benefits from the ability to take multiple readlocks.

Well, I'm certain that I mentioned that in earlier discussions even if you didn't!

- Dave



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to