Hi Dave,

> I think it'd be worth doing this for the control and bulk calls,
> which are the ones that really need this kind of change.

exactly.

> Agreed that copy_{to,from}_user() calls don't need this sort
> of change ... but blocking for an arbitrarily long time while
> holding dev->serialize is exceedingly asocial.

Yes, very asocial.  As for the other routines, that's a question
that can only be answered by benchmarks.  I sent the patches
for them anyway, in the hope you would all love them, and save
me the bother of checking whether they actually do any good...

> So that'd be patches 17 and 18 that are IMO very worth merging,
> with some subset of patch 1 to make them work.  They also
> fix that one bug listed in OSDL bugtraq, also good ..

Duncan.


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on
Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now,
one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology
Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to