On Thursday 05 August 2004 06:39, Olaf Hering wrote: > On Thu, Jul 15, Olaf Hering wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 13, David Brownell wrote: > > > > > Instead, how about: (a) longer timeout, 5 seconds to match OHCI's > > > absurdly long default there; (b) change that "handoff failed" message > > > to add "continuing anyway"; and (c) return 0 as you do, which I'm > > > expecting is the key part of that patch. > > David, what is the status with this bios problem? > Can a patch like this patch go in? > What could we lose if the error is ignored?
I submitted a very similar patch yesterday, not yet merged but closer to what I described: http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-usb-devel%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg26725.html ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
