Yeah I have to work today, Sunday!?!? After I get off if I have time I'll start messing with the bk-usb and bk-acpi patches.
On Sun, 8 Aug 2004 00:20:43 -0400 (EDT), Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 7 Aug 2004, Michael Guterl wrote: > > > What if Alan's assumptions that it is in ACPI and not USB are correct? > > Personally I don't know enough to handle really any of the tasks you > > suggested. I figured the fact that reverting bk-acpi.patch and > > bk-usb.patch would throw up some kind of red flag, that something in > > there was maybe messed up and merged in. > > It was a guess, not an assumption! > > You could test this guess by reverting bk-usb.patch while leaving > bk-acpi.patch intact. > > Alan Stern > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by OSTG. Have you noticed the changes on Linux.com, ITManagersJournal and NewsForge in the past few weeks? Now, one more big change to announce. We are now OSTG- Open Source Technology Group. Come see the changes on the new OSTG site. www.ostg.com _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
