On Thursday 19 August 2004 8:32 am, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Alexander N. Kozhushkin wrote:
> 
> > 3. The  call  completes without  waiting  for  the  device.  The  file
> >    descriptor has been unusable for I/O operations on the device since
> >    the disconnection, therefore the result of the call is not affected
> >    if the  device has  been connected again.   The result of  the call
> >    depends on  the kind of  the called function and  other conditions.
> >    However, the 'close' function closes the file, and there are system
> >    calls which produce a specific error code in such situations.
> 
> As I understand it, the kernel should always use your option 3.  

Certainly USB should do it that way in 2.6, although the device
drivers can try to implement other behavior.  I think that's made
a big improvement in robustness.

Other hotpluggable busses (or 2.4) may not act quite the same.

- Dave
 


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media
100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33
Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift.
http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to