On Tue, 31 Aug 2004, Vojtech Pavlik wrote: >> -D-pad up/down/right/left > >Can be mapped to HATxX and HATxY. Needs incrementing "x" if more real >hats/d-pads are found/
I'm not sure how to map it right, I think that the D-pad up/down should map to HATxY and left/right to HATxX, with the hat_min/hat_max being -1/0 (down/left) and 0/1 (up/right). But, there can't be two controls with the same usage->code, i.e. the D-pad up and D-pad down can't both be mapped to ABS_HATxY, as the code that test_and_set_bit() after the switch() will increment the usage->code. So should both D-pad up and D-pad down get mapped to ABS_HATxY (and similar for left/right) or should up get ABS_HAT0Y (or next available) and down get ABS_HAT1Y? -- Dan Streetman [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------- 186,272 miles per second: It isn't just a good idea, it's the law! ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
