On Monday 30 August 2004 20:20, Alan Stern wrote:

> A couple of months ago you applied a patch from Torsten Scherer to create
> a new unusual_devs.h entry.  In further discussions with him I learned
> that the entry wasn't needed to access the device; the only reason for it
> was as a workaround for some old, buggy hotplug program on his system.
>
> Now Evan Fletcher reports that the entry actively prevents him from using
> his device.  For me that's the last straw, so here's a patch to remove the
> entry.  Torsten should be okay if he simply upgrades his hotplug package
> or removes the buggy program.

Well, I never actually got to patching my hotplug system because, hey, my 
drive did work for me with this patch :-). but it appears that suse (my 
installation) has done it for me. I did an suse-online-update of my system a 
couple of days ago and my hdd seems to work now without this patch, so as 
for me I don't mind removing it.

But, just for curiosity and so that I understand this correctly: Are we 
having two different devices using the same bridge chip here, one of which 
fails on some inquiry commands and the other does not work without them? 
cool... :-(

cheers,
tesche



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools!
Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to