On Tuesday 31 August 2004 1:28 am, Marc Haber wrote: > On Thu, Aug 26, 2004 at 04:22:47PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > I just came across this message in my old mail folder. A patch was sent > > in recently that might help with your problem. You can find the patch > > (for 2.6.8) here: > > Looks like I have been bitten - again - by bad hardware, this time the > system board or memory. After transplanting the entire USB setup, > consisting of the PCI USB 2.0 card, the cable, the USB-to-IDE > enclosure and the disk to another system, the stress test script has > now been running for a week. The other system runs fine on 2.6 without > the USB load though. Bummer.
Could you summarize the two systems? Often some small differences will be significant. Like disabling "usb legacy" support in BIOS, board revisions, bios revisions, southbridge revisions, and so on. Also bigger differences, like different chip vendors! Heck, even the same system running a 64bit kernel vs a 32bit one can make the hardware behave very differently ... :) - Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
