Am Mittwoch, 22. September 2004 22:34 schrieb Alan Stern:
> > I am sure the swsusp people will really appreciate the added
> > necessity to first compute the set of devices that need to run.
>
> Left unsaid is how a suspended device can be woken up automatically when
> it is needed. �Presumably that would be handled by whoever put it to sleep
> in the first place... �And if you manually suspend a drive that contains a
> swap partition, you get what you deserve! �:-)
So you are saying that whoever suspends a device the system needs
is screwed? That is harsh, but certainly a workable approach. But then
suspending devices must be left to root. Is that acceptable?
> > If you want to design a model acceptable to all subsystems _and_
> > the core power management system, it needs to be simple above
> > all.
>
> Unfortunately I only have a limited grasp of the issues involved, let
> alone the special requirements of all the different subsystems...
I trust you to avoid at least USB specific designs.
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on
who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM.
Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
