On Sat, 25 Sep 2004, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > I don't buy your point. From what I know is that OBEX only needs bulk > transfers and these can be used very easy through the USB library. The > big advantage using the USB library is that you also support OBEX over > USB for FreeBSD and MacOS X at the same time with the same code. Think > about that, because this is not about inconsistence. Use the interface > that fits the best and from my view this is not a kernel driver.
I agree to this. Since Greg seems to agree too, I think we can ditch the driver patch, and I'll write the openobex patch. It's a pity though that you only suggested this now, and not three weeks ago when I proposed the OBEX driver - would save some effort. :) -- Alexander Homepage: http://www.sensi.org/~ak/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170 Project Admins to receive an Apple iPod Mini FREE for your judgement on who ports your project to Linux PPC the best. Sponsored by IBM. Deadline: Sept. 24. Go here: http://sf.net/ppc_contest.php _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
