On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 23:18:28 -0400 (EDT) Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > > > On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 12:08:55 -0400 (EDT) > > Alan Stern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Clearly we should support both schemes. [...] > > > > This is not obvious to me. Please share your line of reasoning with me. > > Why is it not possible to cut over to the different scheme at certain > > release? > > Simply because there may be devices that work with the old scheme but not > with the new one. I considered this, and I see it as a textbook case of compatibility with unknown. We will never know unless we give up the traditional sequence, if only temporarily. -- Pete ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
