Hi Dimitris,

Dimitris Lampridis writes:
> OK, that's good news, but I have the same problem with asm/hardware.h
> asm/mach-types.h and asm/arch/dma.h . This whole thing is very
> arm-specific... So in my i386 platform, it doesn't compile. Anyway, I
> guess I don't need things like mach-types, so we should #ifdef their use
> maybe? And if you agree, what is the best #define statement that we
> should use to check?
> 
They should probably go in an architecture dependent header file so we
won't have the main source file cluttered with #ifdef's.
It might even be necessary to split out some functionality from the
isp1362.c file. E.g. the 'platform_device' stuff will need to be
replaced with 'pci_device' specific routines for PCI based systems.

> Perfectly understood, except the 'MASK'. I mean it even has the same
> number (0x600) as 'RW'... And while RW is R+W masks together, why have
> the same thing with another name?
> 
REG_ACCESS_MASK can be used to isolate the access mode bits from the
register specification just like REG_NO_MASK isolates the register
number.


Lothar Wassmann


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to