Alan Stern wrote:
On Tue, 12 Oct 2004, Michael Tokarev wrote:
[]
The real purpose of the SINGLE_LUN flag is to prevent scanning for more
than one LUN when the device only has one but has no way to tell us that.
Especially when the device doesn't fail commands with LUN > 0.
Aha. So it is somewhat confusingly named then. I thought it means
"this device have single lun only, end of story" - so there's no
point at probing how many luns it really have. That to say: current
code, if a device is marked as SINGLE_LUN, *and* GetMaxLun returns
something >0 (ie, the device will successefully(?) reply to GetMaxLun
request), not only the single lun will be probed (for bulk devices
anyway). Maybe DEFAULT_TO_SINGLE_LUN? ;-P
/mjt
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
