Am Mittwoch, 13. Oktober 2004 23:17 schrieb Brian Murphy:
> >That is a common (mis)reading. Therefore a fix is in the pipeline and
> >hopefully in 2.6.9.
> >
> > �
> >
> If you really believe this to be a misreading where in the standards do
> they give
> *any* indication of the order of descriptors within an interface? If you
> insist on the
> interpretation that "after" means "association" then the endpoints after
> the class
> specific descriptors should be closer related to the class specific
> descriptors than
> the interface descriptor. Or more directly where does it say that the
> endpoint
> descriptors are some sort of delimiter indicating the end of the interface?
Well, I don't speak ex cathedra on this issue. The majority of implementors
sees it that way, or all hell would have broken loose already. Real hardware,
as I said, shall be supported.
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal
Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us
Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
