On Friday 15 October 2004 9:48 am, Paul Fulghum wrote: > On Fri, 2004-10-15 at 11:18, Alan Stern wrote: > > Your explanation sounds entirely reasonable to me. Can you pass it on to > > the people responsible for the generic-irq subsystem? > > I CCd Ingo Molnar, who appears to be the originator > of these patches. > > There was a question in my mind about the hcd->description field. > Should it be unique for each device instance instead > of uniform for all device instances on a driver?
It describes the driver ... I think the problem would be that the IRQ registration API seems to have changed requirements. Those labels were never previously treated as anything other than a way to make /proc/interrupts more meaningful. The only request_irq() parameter that "must be globally unique" is the final "void *dev_id". - Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
