On Fri, Oct 01, 2004 at 03:18:23PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > On Fri, 1 Oct 2004, Sjoerd Simons wrote: > > > Ok. dmesg output is attached (probably a lot more then needed).. > > > > In this output i completely removed my cam from unusual devices and it still > > works fine. So i guess my cam has a good usb implemention. Stupid hardware > > vendors, putting all those devices on the same usb id's :( > > > > Sjoerd > > This confirms it. There's no question, Sjoerd's camera behaves according > to 8070, not UFI.
Yes, and since other devices with the same bcdDevice number behave as
UFI devices, the only way to satisfy them both is to have UFI with a
SINGLE_LUN flag, correct?
So my original patch of:
UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x04cb, 0x0100, 0x0000, 0x2210,
"Fujifilm",
"FinePix 1400Zoom",
- US_SC_UFI, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL, US_FL_FIX_INQUIRY),
+ US_SC_UFI, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL, US_FL_FIX_INQUIRY | US_FL_SINGLE_LUN)
Is correct, right Alan?
I'll go ahead and modify the comments a bit and resubmit it today
sometime.
--
Phil Dibowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freeware and Technical Pages Insanity Palace of Metallica
http://www.phildev.net/ http://www.ipom.com/
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
