Hi, thanks for the answers. On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> Answering in order, the right thing would depend on your objective. > If you just want storage, you probably want ub disabled (unless > you run a large SMP box where you flip KVM often; this is a typical > scenario on IBM Bladecenter, which was one of big motivators for ub). Hm, what, if someone needs both (no, I don't atm:-))? I see the choice is made in usbcore at compile time with #ifdef CONFIG_..._UB... If I understand it correct, that's because usbcore builds a table of USB class <-> driver pairs. Wouldn't it be better to leave this decision to the hotplug system altogether? So that when the USB core notices a new device, it requests not a specific module to be loaded, but a class-support, and then the hotplug-daemon would decide based on its configuration, which module to load / attach to this device? I might well be saying nonsense here... Thanks Guennadi --------------------------------- Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D. DSA Daten- und Systemtechnik GmbH Pascalstr. 28 D-52076 Aachen Germany ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
