On Sat, Oct 23, 2004 at 12:06:59PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: > On Saturday 23 October 2004 09:51, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, David Brownell wrote: > > > > > So long as it doesn't get in the way of me finishing basic integration > > > of USB_SUSPEND and system suspend, I'm all for it! > > > > It shouldn't interfere. Although it will need to be updated when your > > wakeup_supported/enabled stuff gets added to the driver model structures. > > Call me paranoid ... the hub driver is in usbcore, right between > the HCDs (which don't all handle the necessary suspend transitions > right yet) and the PM core (which doesn't do so either). So while > I agree with "should", it seems far from "will" (not intefere)... > > We should deploy autosuspend in some other drivers first. Storage > would be a good trial ... all the control goes from CPU to device, there > are no status or wakeup events going the other direction. I'd be > pleasantly surprised if autosuspend there turned up no problems...
Um... there isn't any published (at least in the storage specifications)
way to suspend a device.
Actually, I don't see a method in the unpublished specifications, either.
Matt
--
Matthew Dharm Home: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Maintainer, Linux USB Mass Storage Driver
C: They kicked your ass, didn't they?
S: They were cheating!
-- The Chief and Stef
User Friendly, 11/19/1997
pgpqSLY750q3t.pgp
Description: PGP signature
