> Actually, I had applied your patch to be on the safe side, (that > is, the change in hub.c from msleep(10) to msleep(20) before > getting all of this to it's current state. I didn't test it before > this change, so I'm not sure how much it affects it.
Try to increase the msleep(20) further if you see specifically the enumeration failure. This change does not however affect failures in later stages. > > It may be some kind of timing bug, similar to what I see > > with 1160 with some devices. Recently I reported about a > > timing problem and the solution to it. After that I could > > remove most of the debug info and everything worked. > > (This is referring to the above-mentioned patch, I'm assuming) Yes. Olav ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
