On Thu, 4 Nov 2004, Dieter Weber wrote: > Yes, it helped. :)) > > The appended patch fixes this problem for me. As I am not sure if waiting for > additional 100 µs causes a noticeable difference in regard of performance, I > wrote a few lines to distinguish the chips by idProduct and bcdDevice. > I am not happy with the "magic numbers", what's the best way to get rid of > them? > > Thank you very much for your help!
Have you been able to try using different delays between 100 and 200 microseconds? Can you say what the minimum necessary value is? Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
