On Sun, 19 Dec 2004, David Brownell wrote: > On Sunday 19 December 2004 8:07 am, Alan Stern wrote: > > David: > > > > Is it just a simple mistake that sl811h_probe returns 0 if it can't > > allocate its private data structure? I'm going to assume that it is and > > change the value to -ENOMEM. > > Yes, good catch. Could you also add release_mem_region() > calls there too? That particular (unlikely) failure case > has more issues than just the wrong fault code.
Done. These will show up in the series of patches I will post later today. Maybe you could check the final state of that driver? I don't have the hardware to test it. (Not to mention that I don't have the right architecture even to _build_ the other non-PCI drivers!) Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
