On Sunday 19 December 2004 11:06 pm, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 22:43:05 -0800, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It also seems to mean significantly slower access (at high speed)
> > for the most standard devices. That doesn't seem like a win,
> > though I suspect fixing it should be as simple as switching over
> > to use the USB scatterlist calls (which usb-storage uses) ...
>
> They do not allow asynchronous operation, last time I checked.
You could add an async mode ... heck, even the hack of dedicating
a kernel thread to that task ("psuedo-async" within "ub") would
give much more reasonable throughput.
- Dave
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
