Am Dienstag, 21. Dezember 2004 04:47 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > imho you should not have active URBs for suspended devices in the first
> > place.
>
> I agree that you should not. Should usbcore be changed so that you
> _cannot_?
But we have a callback for suspend(). So usbcore doesn't need to
be involved. Following the example of disconnect() it probably should.
I don't think we can disallow unlinking URBs during suspend because
a driver may be unloaded. So either we allow unlinking which is hard,
or kill all pending URBs.
Regards
Oliver
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
