As far as i can diff it, test it, track it (fairly easy, though this
code is not from me) seems to work, to do the job and to be clean ;)


Am Dienstag, den 21.12.2004, 11:42 -0800 schrieb Pete Zaitcev:
> On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 12:10:33 +0100, Martin Strigl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > did a lot of other research till i found this thread
> > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=8928441
> > 
> > it works for me now - but the real question is, why hasn't this simple
> > patch found its way into the standard branch of 2.4.x ?
> 
> Because you didn't submit it. Patches are not sentient and not even animated,
> they cannot find their way by themselves. You and only you have to do the
> work of diffing, testing, tracking (because you're bothered by the bug).
> 
> -- Pete
-- 
mfG,
Martin Strigl
friendlynet - meyer KEG
Humboldtstrasse 11
A-4020 Linz
AUSTRIA
FON +43 732 600 232 12
FAX +43 732 600 232 14
GSM +43 699 180 023 21
WEB www.friendlynet.at
MEL [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. 
http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to