Thanks for the replies. > I am positive about it, but I am not thrilled with extra #ifdef's. > I need to look closer, maybe it can be abstracted a little bit.
It works but I agree it's a bit ugly. > Also, a patch to run 2.4 under Xen is not about to be merged anyway, right? > So, this cannot be terribly urgent. Not urgent at all, so don't worry about it too much :-) With 2.4 being in deep freeze, I'm not expecting merge of the Xen into the official tree. For my purposes, I can add a patch into the XenLinux 2.4 build process. However, I thought it might also fix builds with non-PCI USB controllers. I don't understand how they can possibly build hcd.c without using something similar to the patch I posted...? Cheers, Marlk ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
