El s�b, 08-01-2005 a las 18:26, Alan Stern escribi�: > On Sat, 8 Jan 2005, Phil Dibowitz wrote: > > > Here - I couldn't make that patch you sent apply. Not sure why. I re-did > > it by hand, and I've attached it. You also didn't put a Signed-off-by > > line in your patch, so I added that for you (I figure you want credit > > for your patch). > > > > This work for you? >
yes, it does. [...] > Why is this patch needed? What happens without it? Don't just say "The > camera doesn't work"; I'd like to see an explanation of what goes wrong > or else a usb-storage verbose debugging log. > It seems this Pentax camera is not conformant to the USB storage specification (It does not like the INQUIRY command. So we must handle this command of the SCSI layer ourselves.). here you have a report: http://www.qbik.ch/usb/devices/search_res.php?pattern=pentax http://www.qbik.ch/usb/devices/showdev.php?id=3028 and device descriptor: http://www.qbik.ch/usb/devices/showdescr.php?id=3028 BR miquel
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente
