On Thursday 13 January 2005 18:25, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2005, Jan De Luyck wrote:
> > > > The Genesys increased delay in this patch causes strange issues, the
> > > > USB disconnects after a while...
> > > >
> > > > I rewrote the identifier like it was previous this patch
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > if (us->pusb_dev->descriptor.idVendor == USB_VENDOR_ID_GENESYS &&
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > and it works like I expected it to...
> > >
> > > I don't understand.  That line of code wasn't changed by the patch. 
> > > The patch only changed a comment and changed udelay(100) to
> > > udelay(110).
> >
> > If you check the 2.6.11-rc1 patch, you'll see that that line is changed
> > too. It's wrapped around with something.. can't check right now.
>
> Ah, you must be talking about the le16_to_cpu() addition.  That wasn't
> part of the increased-delay patch; it was in a separate changeset.
>
> The line now reads:
>
>   if (le16_to_cpu(us->pusb_dev->descriptor.idVendor) ==
> USB_VENDOR_ID_GENESYS)
>
> The le16_to_cpu() part _is_ necessary.  The value it's looking at, the
> descriptor.idVendor, used to be stored in native byte order but now is
> stored in little-endian order.  If you're using an x86 system, of course,
> there won't be any difference.

Yes, it's that that i meant. Strangely enough, when i removed that part it 
worked again..... Is there some extra delay added by that?

I've currently reverted back to 2.6.10 because of stability problems with my 
ppp connection which i do need daily.

Jan

-- 
A light wife doth make a heavy husband.
  -- Wm. Shakespeare, "The Merchant of Venice"


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to