On Tue, 18 Jan 2005 13:51:22 -0800, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Thereby breaking usb on various systems ... by overwriting the root hub
> status message data as part of bounce buffer handling.   NOT a good idea!
> Those patches were added for important reasons.  (Or did you add some
> other solution to the issue described in that comment?)

What was the nature of the breakage exactly? Like I mentioned, everything
is peachy here, but I don't have weirdo controllers like sl81xx or what is
it called.

> Also, I don't like the idea of scattering knowledge all over the place
> that the root hub is always given address 1 ... heck, I'd rather it use
> address 128 so that Linux can eventually acesss all 127 devices!

This can be encapsulated. The important part was to remove the abuse
of URB_NO_TRANSFER_DMA_MAP.

> There are a lot of non-usbmon patches mixed into this ...

Not a lot, but yes, I'm sorry about that.

-- Pete


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to