Matthew Dharm wrote:
I was concerned, also... that is, until I noticed that the entry was using
US_SC_DEVICE, which means it _wasn't_ doing a subclass override.
In other words, the comment was wrong.
Um - the first entry does that, but that's not where the comment is removed:
-/* This entry is needed because the device reports Sub=ff */
UNUSUAL_DEV( 0x054c, 0x0010, 0x0106, 0x0450,
"Sony",
"DSC-S30/S70/S75/505V/F505/F707/F717/P8",
US_SC_SCSI, US_PR_DEVICE, NULL,
- US_FL_SINGLE_LUN ),
+ US_FL_SINGLE_LUN | US_FL_NOT_LOCKABLE ),
That uses US_SC_SCSI.
--
Phil Dibowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freeware and Technical Pages Insanity Palace of Metallica
http://www.phildev.net/ http://www.ipom.com/
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
