On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 01:07:17PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:51:36AM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 10:58:02AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 01:37:39PM -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > Please consider applying.
> > > > 
> > > > Description: Use wait_event_timeout() instead of custom wait-queue 
> > > > code. Remove
> > > > now unused variables.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > 
> > > Applied, thanks.
> > 
> > Greg,
> > 
> > This should fix the behavior of the previous patch (probably not noticed 
> > yet).
> > The wake_up*() was not matched properly in the first patch (fixed below). 
> > Please
> > consider reverting the previous patch and applying this one instead. I 
> > think it
> > may actually have been somewhat broken in the original code, actually :)
> 
> Description: Modify the wake_up*() calls to match the wait_event*() ones
> from a previous patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Applied, thanks.

greg k-h


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to