On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, David Brownell wrote: > On Wednesday 09 February 2005 12:44 pm, Alan Stern wrote: > > > While you're at it, please remove also that comment about HCDs returning > > ETIMEDOUT for other reasons. They don't, not any more. > > OHCI always has -- for the "device not responding" error. Still does > in all my local trees, and in Greg's BK.
Darn it, you're right. SL811 too. But I've already changed Documentation/usb/error-codes.txt to say that -EPROTO or -EILSEQ is the return code for that error. :-( It seems like a good idea to try and keep separate the notions of device not responding versus URB timed out. Do you mind using a different error code for no-response? Alan Stern ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
