On Wed, Feb 09, 2005 at 02:00:44PM -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:11:27 -0800, Nishanth Aravamudan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Is 3 * (MSECS_IN_SECS / 2) really all that much clearer than 1500? > > It would be better if it were just MS, IMHO.
Do you mean you prefer 3 * (MS / 2) or the 1500 version? i.e. do you want an MS constant (as it's name) or do you prefer ms version? Sorry for being dense, I just want to be certain I understand. > I like when it's clear if it's us, ms, ns. For example, usbmon timestamps > are in microseconds because milliseconds have proven inadequate. Indeed, clarity is *definitely* to be valued... Thanks, Nish ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click _______________________________________________ [email protected] To unsubscribe, use the last form field at: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel
