On Thursday 10 February 2005 2:28 pm, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:04:27 -0800, David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 February 2005 1:46 pm, Brian Murphy wrote:
> 
> > > Yes, this fixes the problem (has run through 100 reboots today without 
> > > problem). It would crash after 10-15 reboots before.
> > 
> > Excellent, thanks.  Then I'll recommend this for 2.6 and 2.4 integration 
> > ASAP.
> 
> There's no unlink_async() in 2.4.

Curses, foiled again!

Looks like a 2.4 patch will have to pull that logic out of ehci_urb_dequeue()
the way 2.6 did a while back.  This isn't one of the areas where 2.4 has any
reason to differ from 2.6.  2.6 pulled that logic out so it could also be
reused from ehci_endpoint_disable, and 2.4 doesn't have that mechanism.

Pete, if you were to do that it'd surely happen a lot quicker than if I did...
could you be persuaded?  I strongly suspect this is the root cause of the only
2.4 trouble report I've received recently; and the reporter was quite willing
to test any "high quality" patches for this issue.

- Dave


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
[email protected]
To unsubscribe, use the last form field at:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-usb-devel

Reply via email to